Hero Image

STRANGEPLACE Unbestimmtheitsstellen

Explo­ration of the Approx­i­mate

Exhi­bi­tion project explor­ing ques­tions of per­spec­tive and the con­struc­tion of real­i­ty through tech­nol­o­gy and con­text, image and move­ment.

A dia­log­i­cal encounter amidst ram­pant hyper­re­al­i­ty, between space explo­ration archives and spa­tial per­cep­tion,

error and case study, vast noise and closed cir­cuit.


Felix Pausch: Instal­la­tion

Peter Voigt : Photography

Felix Pausch • Installation

Frankfurt‐based soci­ol­o­gist, artist, and exhi­bi­tion man­ag­er. Works in visu­al arts with an empha­sis on instal­la­tion, closed‐circuit, video, and occa­sion­al­ly per­for­ma­tive inter­sec­tions of audio, video, and per­for­mance. For­mer­ly active at SIKS‐Frankfurt, HoRsT‐Gallus, and in extrem­ism research; cur­rent­ly at ZKM Karlsruhe.

Peter Voigt • Photography

Peter Voigt’s works in Unbes­timmtheitsstellen trace a his­toric and artis­tic line from the ear­ly days of ana­log elec­tron­ic pho­tog­ra­phy to con­tem­po­rary dig­i­tal image cap­ture. His pho­tographs build on trans­mis­sion errors and image faults first encoun­tered in the space pho­tog­ra­phy of the 1960s and 1970s, par­tic­u­lar­ly in NASA’s Sur­vey­or, Viking and Voy­ager mis­sions. These ear­ly glitch­es — caused by unsta­ble elec­tron­ic sig­nals and mechan­i­cal imper­fec­tions — become the start­ing point for a dia­logue with today’s syn­chro­niza­tion and black bal­ance errors found in high-res­o­lu­tion dig­i­tal backs.

Voigt delib­er­ate­ly works with the tech­ni­cal mar­gins of imag­ing devices, trans­form­ing unin­tend­ed faults into visu­al phe­nom­e­na that ques­tion per­cep­tion and real­i­ty. Using both orig­i­nal NASA images and his own con­tem­po­rary pho­tog­ra­phy, he reveals a con­ti­nu­ity of fragili­ty in tech­no­log­i­cal vision, despite decades of devel­op­ment. In Unbes­timmtheitsstellen, data loss, sig­nal noise, and syn­chro­niza­tion fail­ures are no longer mere mis­takes — they become mark­ers of a broad­er uncer­tain­ty, a reminder that even the most advanced imag­ing tech­nolo­gies remain bound to error, con­text, and interpretation.

/user/pages/02.past-exhibition/07.Unbestimmtheitsstellen/09._sunset/CF009709groundwork_1_1.jpg

Ana­log elec­tron­ic photography

Ear­ly space mis­sions used ana­log elec­tron­ic imag­ing sys­tems with Vidi­con tubes to cap­ture still pho­tographs. These cam­eras scanned scenes line by line, con­vert­ing visu­al data into ana­log sig­nals for trans­mis­sion. Image qual­i­ty was lim­it­ed by tube sen­si­tiv­i­ty and the insta­bil­i­ty of ana­log trans­mis­sion, often result­ing in noise, dis­tor­tions, and miss­ing data.
While the image cap­ture itself remained ana­log, lat­er mis­sions began using dig­i­tal trans­mis­sion meth­ods, improv­ing reli­a­bil­i­ty and clar­i­ty. Ana­log imag­ing sys­tems were also used in sci­en­tif­ic, indus­tri­al, and sur­veil­lance con­texts, but remained niche due to their cost and com­plex­i­ty. Today, their char­ac­ter­is­tic flaws have become part of the visu­al lega­cy of ear­ly machine vision.

Sur­vey­or 3 mosa­ic

Orig­i­nal vin­tage NASA pho­to­graph

Sil­ver gelatin print

80 x 105 cm

print­ed in 1966

Strangelove Col­lec­tion (prove­nance: Enrique Gar­cia, NASA).

/user/pages/02.past-exhibition/07.Unbestimmtheitsstellen/12._strangeprobe/Strange Surveyor 1.jpg

Strange Sur­vey­or 1

As part of the exhi­bi­tion, we doc­u­ment­ed the floor of our exhi­bi­tion space using a super high-res­o­lu­tion cam­era sys­tem, which we humor­ous­ly named Strange Sur­vey­or 1. The result­ing series, titled Ground­work, mim­ics the ear­ly space mosa­ic pho­tographs of mis­sions like Sur­vey­or. Indi­vid­ual images were stitched togeth­er into large-scale com­po­si­tions; the orig­i­nal files reach dimen­sions of up to eight meters in height. For prac­ti­cal rea­sons, the prints were pro­duced at a reduced size.

groundwork-1
/user/pages/02.past-exhibition/07.Unbestimmtheitsstellen/13._phase-glitch2/strangeplace-petervoigt.jpg

Dig­i­tal Sen­sor Artifacts

Glitch­es in dig­i­tal backs often arise from syn­chro­niza­tion errors between the sen­sor read­out and the shut­ter mech­a­nism, par­tic­u­lar­ly in com­plex cam­era sys­tems. Addi­tion­al faults can occur dur­ing black cal­i­bra­tion process­es, where incor­rect dark frame data is applied. Envi­ron­men­tal fac­tors such as sta­t­ic charges, elec­tri­cal inter­fer­ence, or sud­den tem­per­a­ture changes can fur­ther desta­bi­lize sig­nal integri­ty — lead­ing to vis­i­ble arti­facts like band­ing, ghost­ing, col­or shifts, or cor­rupt­ed image segments.

Iron­i­cal­ly, these errors tend to appear dur­ing the most crit­i­cal pro­duc­tions, when they are least wel­come. For­tu­nate­ly, instead of dis­card­ing them in frus­tra­tion, I decid­ed to pre­serve these rare moments of tech­no­log­i­cal mis­be­hav­ior — and are now hap­py to share them.

Strange­place Edi­tion Nr.: 4